Friday, August 31, 2012
Monday, August 27, 2012
UPDATE August 26, 2012
Not much going on here, these days. I’m happy to report that
my friend James has finished his masters at Oxford. We hung out on Thursday and
Friday as he came into London to visit before leaving on Monday, the 27th
of August. I also got to see my friend Belinda visiting from Bosnia. That was a
real treat. We’d only met at a wedding and lunch later about 3 years and some
months ago and have been e-buddies since. So it was good to see each other in
person again. Hopefully I’ll be able to visit Bosnia at some time in the
future. I actually won vouchers for free housing in Bosnia at a Bosnian night
that she hosted when I lived in Cape Town.
I am happy to report that a week ago I had my first ukulele
lesson. And it was a blast. It was a group lesson, and the woman was really
sweet. My company pays for discounts for these lessons, so I think I may
continue and do a few more. Ukuleles are only £20-30 and it’s a great way to
keep making music. Of course, my company has a music recording studio; the only
issue is being able to book it since it’s free and the instruments in there are
pretty amazing.
The other surprising thing that happened this week is that I
was awarded a peer bonus at work. It’s ridiculously surprising because normally
I feel (I don’t believe but I feel) like I do a horrible job. Anyway, a peer
bonus is when a peer recommends you for a bonus for going above and beyond your
duties; you can’t do it for your boss, but your boss or manager must approve of
it. You get a certificate and some money. I’m not sure I went above and beyond
normal duty, but I was quite appreciative of the bonus. Here are the words:
"I'd like to thank
Victor for his support in reviewing the training materials and certification
exam questions for the Academy. I know it can be a bit of a tedious job
especially with the amount of documents we have, but Victor goes above and
beyond by providing excellent comments, clear and concise when necessary, and
other times with longer clarifying notes. Much appreciated!"
CORRECTIONS & AMENDMENTS
Three questions arose from the last updates—one about Shakespeare, one about
the beliefs and
actions embedded in the human condition, and one about acculturation.
First, some people want to know what my personal opinion is as to the identity
of Shakespeare, the playwright. I still have more to read in the authorship
debate, and, so far, I see enough problems that I have reasonable doubt. Even
if the majority of Shakespeare academicians are correct that William of
Stratford is William Shakespeare, there are still some peculiarities to the
story and questions that I would love to see answered. However, I try to look
at it from a legal perspective in which case the job is not to necessarily
prove authorship one way or the other (which may not be possible) but to come
to the best determination of authorship. Legally, the difficulty lies in the
use of “reasonable doubt” as a litmus test to decide if you can comfortably
come to a determination of “guilty,” if you can agree with the plaintiff. This
is a problem because a legal case involving the authorship of Shakespeare’s
plays would put the onus of proof on the various conspiracy theories or anyone
claiming William of Stratford was not the author. In this case, to prove
William of Stratford guilty of falsely claiming credit, you would have to prove
someone else wrote beyond any reasonable doubt. This is quite hard to do. I
might say there is reasonable doubt about the authorship of William of
Stratford, but that is different from the difficult task of removing any
reasonable doubt that William of Stratford took credit from someone else who
wrote it. And a legal case would require that proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
And as it stands now, even though there is a plausible fit between the Earl of
Oxford’s motivations, education, and opportunity with Shakespeare’s plays, it
is hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt regardless if you have doubt about the
authorship of William of Stratford.
Now check this out. Last year, there was a Slate
article on a U.S. Supreme Court Shakespeare case about a mock trial held in
Washington, DC on November 25th, 1987. This court was presided over
by three U.S. Supreme Court Justices at the time—John Paul Stevens, Harry
Blackmun, and William Brennan. This case, originally described in a New
Yorker article the following year in 1988, featured a representative
arguing for the generally assumed authorship of William of Stratford and
another representative arguing for the authorship of the 17th Earl
of Oxford, Edward de Vere. The court decided in favour of William of Stratford,
saying there was insufficient evidence to prove the authorship of de Vere (you
see where the burden of proof lies). But this is where it gets interesting.
According to the Slate article, both Blackmun and Stevens “expressed
reservations about the decision,” and in April 2009 Stevens told the
Wall Street Journal that he changed his mind, now believing Edward de Vere
wrote Shakespeare’s plays. In fact of the justices asked this question in April
2009, there were only two justices—William Kennedy and Stephen
Breyer—unreservedly thought William of Stratford is the author. Three other
justices refused to comment (Alito, Thomas, and Roberts). Again, the burden of
proof is on a challenger, not just to point out questions about the authorship
of William of Stratford but to prove beyond reasonable doubt that someone else
wrote it. And that hasn’t been done. Regardless, in the end, it doesn’t really
matter. We can
still enjoy the plays for what they are worth.
The second point came from one of my
best of friends, Praj (housemate extraordinaire). Praj challenged me on the
section “The Town,” saying
that isn’t it possible for someone like Hitler to have both good and bad parts
instead of being all bad? What he says is right, of
course; people have good parts and bad parts. I was talking about contradictory
messages. Does Hitler care about human lives or children? In one context, you
might say yes; in another you might say no. Hitler himself would say yes and
tried to construct an image of what he wanted the world to see or know (he did
the exact same thing at the concentration camp at Theresien in which he invited the world to see
what was going on, showing himself as a really great guy). So I was (poorly)
pointing to the fact that the truth of us is not in the constructed image of
ourselves (which does involve actions in order to construct the image) but in
actions outside of the construct.
I was focusing on the
tensions between differing words and deeds. Are you the deeds or the words?
Instead of being able to believe one thing (I’m a loving human being; look at
how I treat children in this magazine article about me or when visitors came to
one of the concentration camps) and do another (killing people), I was simply
talking about what you do not being separate from what you believe but being
the very thing you believe (the truth lying in your actions).
The last response to the last update was related to the
section “Learn
from Immigrants.” My good friend Sophia, one of the Peace Corps Volunteers
that I have learned the most from, is pursuing a PhD in sociology/social
anthropology/political ecology/human geography or something like that (very
interdisciplinary work she’s doing). She passed on an article to me about the crowning
of a new Ashanti chief of New York. It’s a great example of immigrant
customs persisting in new environments and countries. What struck me about the
story is that I didn’t know any sub-Saharan African chief-based tribes
installed chiefs over areas in other countries, like New York. It fascinated
me. Like the Ashanti mentioned in the article, my Nigerian state and my
Nigerian “county” (collection of villages) also have cultural and fund-raising
non-profit organisations in the U.S. But we don’t install chiefs, so it was
very interesting to see the extent that some traditions continue and survive
and actually aid the survival of a people. And like the Ashanti cultural group,
my cultural groups also struggle to pass the baton to the next generation who
generally tend to be less interested in such organisations than their parents.
Due to a recent trip to Italy, I wondered if Italian immigrants experienced the
same things in other parts of the world.
ITALY – CULTURE
So I went on a trip to Italy and met with Bianca there. Some missionaries she knew in Rome
hosted us. It was a pretty nice trip, and I could write for days on it. Instead
I’ll give you a link to a blog
on Italy that sums up our trip. I left for the trip on my birthday. So it
was a nice present of sorts. I never imagined or thought of going to Italy,
honestly. Most of my trips or travels are service-style trips to developing
countries. The funny thing about Italy is that it’s considered a developed
country but it has a kind of developing country feel or even a very
small-country feel.
Traffic lanes are a suggestion and you can drive however you
want.
Three cars can meet an cobblestone intersection with no
lights or stop signs and the people will stick their heads out of the window
and argue about who show move or back down. The entire walking population in
the area stops and watches. This actually happened while I was in Rome.
People in Italy will yell, scream, argue, beg, and plead
with customer service representatives when the service is poor or when they
have been wronged in someway (complete opposite of the UK). People speak with
their hands a lot. A lot. It’s interesting.
There graffiti everywhere. Everywhere. It was hard to find a
subway car or an aboveground train car that did not have graffiti on it.
There are lots of people hustling to give you a guided tour
or hustling to give you a taxi ride.
And pickpockets are everywhere.
(If you watch Burn Notice, I’m about to do one of those Burn
Notice-teaching moments) When you are being trained in certain industries, one
thing you learn or know is that pickpockets use the art of distraction. For
that reason, whenever I am bumped or there is pressure against me, I know I
should be checking my pockets. The other technique I use a lot is to
consciously “listen” for the feeling of my wallet against my leg. The brain
receives millions of stimuli every second. The brain also uses a certain
filtering mechanism, so you aren’t overwhelmed by an overload of information.
Even in the area of memory, sensory memory is the first
level of memory, and nothing will be encoded into short-term memory unless
something or someone calls your attention to something that you are sensing. If
you stop and concentrate right now, you probably realise you can hear tons of
things you didn’t realise you were hearing—the hum of the air conditioning
unit, the rustle of leaves, the chirping of bids, the typing of the keyboard,
some weird knocking sound in your pipes. So one technique I use is to tell my
brain that the feeling of the wallet against my leg is important and I want to
keep feeling it, focusing on it. This allows me to notice more quickly when it
is gone or being moved.
Well, I’ve never been pick-pocketed so I’ve never had to
worry about it if works, but in Rome, pick-pockets are everywhere, and on this
particular day I was wearing cargo-shorts (khaki, short trousers/pants with the
extra side pockets).a guy with a tight-fitting t-shirt, almost-bald head, large
sunglasses, and dark blue new looking-jeans above white
sneakers/trainers/tennis shoes was staring at me intently as I stood near the
exit door of the bus. I believe this gave him a nice opportunity since he would
have a reason to stand near the exit bus. So he came over and stood as if
waiting to exit and he pushed against me. Now his push wasn’t unnatural. It
felt like it was just a crowded spot; though you could always ask “Why didn’t
he stand further away and wait until the bus came to a stop and then go towards
the door?” That’s true, too. Anyway, when he was pushing against me, something
told me “that’s pressure” so I just lightly put my hands over the opening of
the right side pocket with my wallet and passport. I did not turn around and
acknowledge anything as I was facing the left side of the bus talking to Bianca
who was seated. He did also did not turn around and acknowledge anything as he
was facing the right side of the bus with the exit door and carrying a jacket
which he was using for covering. As soon as I put my hand to my side pocket, I
felt his fingers trying to slowly and smoothly reach into my pocket. I remained
calm and closed the pocket saying nothing. The bus stopped and he got off. It
shook me, though; it really shook me. I was supposed to move closer to the front
to the driver could tell me when my stop was but I missed the opportunity
because I was still processing what happened. Bianca thought I was crazy just
standing there. Then the next stop came and the driver was calling out and I
was still in a daze, and then we realized this was our stop and we got off to
go visit one of the ancient Roman catacombs that harboured Christians running
from Roman persecution.
Usually, when in another country, the first thing I
subconsciously try to do when talking to someone for information is find out
which language to use. Which of us speaks the other person’s language better.
However this was hard to do in Italy because no one admitted to speaking
English well or even a fare amount of English. The answer to “Do you speak
English” was always “no” or “a little bit.” So then you speak Italian to the
person and she answers back in English. If you speak English, he answers back
with better English than you. I’ve realized that they must have a high standard
for speaking a language since no one speaks English. And then there were
tourist places where people actually didn’t speak any English. So you had to
speak Italian. I couldn’t believe it when one day, two women asked me to be an
interpreter or intermediary between them and the bus driver because he didn’t
speak English. It’s funny because I don’t really speak Italian but I know more
Italian than the driver who didn’t speak any English. And it actually worked, I
could get the point across. At one point the woman wanted me to ask what time
we would arrive at her stop. I asked him but his answer didn’t make sense to
me. The only thing I could think was to tell my brain to think. So that’s what
I did. Slowly but surely, my brain began to register that he said something
like 10:30 PM in a long drawn-out way. Thank goodness for similarities between
Latin-based languages. The sad part about that day was that we were trying to
catch a train into Tuscany to a town called Sienna (where the colour Burnt
Sienna comes from). The train station announced that the train was canceled
(all in Italian). Later we found out that a bus would come and take us to our
stops. Then it turns out that a train did come, but because we were outside
waiting for the bus, we had to run back in and try to catch it, but it left
before we got to it in time. No apology from the train staff. We wait longer
for the bus, and two of our group (two Italian women) get a ride from someone
driving to Florence (Sienna is on the way to Florence). So the rest of the
group is left. The train station staff do not seem to know when a bus is
coming, or at times, if a bus is coming. We’re all a bit distressed because
there are no more trains to our destination. Finally a bus arrives, and it
takes probably 45 minutes to an hour to leave because the bus driver refuses to
take 3 women and one child to Florence where the train was ultimately going. Whoever
had called the bus didn’t give the bus orders to take all the people who were
waiting for the train to all the stops the train was going to go. So the women
were visibly and aurally upset, crying, yelling, screaming. The train station
staff had all left by this time and there was no service even though there were
still trains coming in and out of the station. Finally the bus driver called a
bus company colleague to come down and explain to the women that the bus would
not go to Florence; this was completely unfair. They finally got off the bus
(they had refused before) crying and standing at the station as we left. I
don’t know what happened to them, but I should have done something better to
explain we would have paid for the bus to go to Florence if that was the issue
especially since the train station promised we would all be taken to our
destinations by bus.
My favourite part of the trip was spent in a group of five
towns in the northwest Mediterranean coast of Italy. The towns are called
Cinque Terre and each of the towns sits on a cliff overlooking the water. The
towns range in size from 200 like the town we stayed in and 500 residents for
the bigger more touristy towns and they are located in the Italian Riviera
area, not as glitzy as the French Riviera but still quite beautiful. I loved
these towns. It felt good to feel like a local and see the people and greet
them each morning and night. The hiking was brilliant in these parts and the
swimming, though quite cold, was a good way to cool down. Instead of sand
beaches, though, they are mostly rock beaches. But I still enjoyed myself as I
had not yet experienced summer in London. So this was a welcome vacation and
warm respite from the cool, cool London. The weather made me wonder how the art
would compare between the UK and Italy.
Locks hung by lovers, an Italian tradition
Labels:
Cinque Terre,
Culture,
developing country,
hiking,
Italy,
pickpockets,
stealth,
swimming
ITALY—ART
The Coloseum at Night
The Coloseum during the day
View looking down from the top of St. Peter's Basilica
View from my Sienna window
View at night from walk near my Sienna window
Even the Vatican was a big museum. I thought they allow you
to go to the Vatican and see the offices and library. They didn’t. Or maybe
they do, and I didn’t understand how to access it. Instead I saw the Vatican
museum that did include former offices and housing of the popes. And yes, it
includes the Sistine Chapel with Michaelangelo’s famous ceiling painting
including the “Finger of God.” I thought it might be over-hyped, but it was
very impressive. I wish we could have gotten closer to the ceiling but it was
still impressive just looking up. Michaelangelo was commissioned to paint this
ceiling by Pope Julius II who had promised a commission of 40 statues for his
tomb and Michaelangelo thought that Pope Julius II might finally stop stalling
if he did this. What is amazing about it that Michaelangelo considered himself
a sculptor and preferred working with stone rather than paint. Michaelangelo
had to learn the difficult and masterful technique of buon fresco in order to
do the ceiling. On top of that, he had to learn perspective techniques that
would allow him to paint on curved surfaces and still have the figures look
correct from 60 feet below. All in all, I was quite amazed. With over 5,000
feet of frescos, it took over 4 years. Though it should have taken less (there
were some initial mistakes learning the new techniques but the bulk of lost
time was due to Pope Julius II being ill near death or out waging war) it is a
marvel to look at visually and historically.
The art pieces in Italy are a bit like that. There is the
piece, but then there is the history behind the piece, the work and sweat that
comes through the piece, and the beauty embedded deep within the piece.
Sometimes you can visit a piece, like the Mona Lisa in the Louvre, and you say
to yourself “Is that it? Is this what all the hype is about?” It’s small and
not particularly conspicuous. I think it may be more famous because of the
question over the identity of the model. However, there are critics
who say it has to do with the ambiguity of the expression, the forms, its
monumentality, and the atmospheric illusionism. However when you are in
Florence and go to see Michaelangelo’s
David, it’s staggering, I mean really. Yes, anatomically, it’s pretty good
(though Michaelangelo is criticized for being over-muscly at times, it’s common
for artists to sacrifice anatomy and nature for art), but the sheer size of it
is overwhelming. You can see intricacies like veins. I can talk about the
fusion of Greek art with Renaissance sensibilities but I won’t; it’s just nice
to admire. As an engineer, what touched me the most was that the University of
Bologna’s Civil and Environmental Engineering department had a machine set up
and connected to the base of the statue from the back. They were studying and
monitoring crack propagation through the statue. I thought that that was an
amazing project for the engineers to involve themselves. I always remember
people who studied crack propagation in my department. I never thought that
some people would have the chance to apply it to the statue of David.
Most stunningly is that the city of Rome is a piece of art. Both Rome and Florence are set in the basin of seven hills. And as you walk the streets of Rome, all the buildings have the style of structure you associate with Spain like the Spanish tile roofs. You leisurely stroll on cobblestone paths through narrow passageways lit by a single lamp between burnt-Sienna brick walls with the smell of pesto and tomato sauce wafting in the air. You see a small restaurant with 3 tables in the street
and people taking in the lovely night air as they smile at you and stare. An accordion is playing in the street, and as you pass by you hear the accordionist say “Buona Sera” to which you say “Buona Sera.” As you walk past, the accordion music fades into the background as the rush of water grows in intensity and the narrow passageway opens into a beautiful piazza (think plaza or square) with a fountain in the middle in which water is gushing out of a beautiful statue of Triton and his mermaids. People mill about it making wishes, taking pictures, eating food. All around the square and fountain are open-air restaurants, music playing, and people watching
people. To one side you find an old, dark grey,
austere building with amazingly tall dark stone columns, still preserved, but with pieces missing and chunks of stone gone. The building is capped by dome with a hole in the center that takes in the last vestiges of dying light from a sunset that refuses to die quietly. You go inside and the light of the sunset shines through the whole in the top at a diagonal angle and rests on you as you survey the embellished, Renaissance-style architecture of the walls in near obscurity. You try to take photos but you can never quite capture what your eyes see, what your ears hear, what your skin feels . . . what your nose smells, what your taste buds crave, and what your tummy wants. Food.
Labels:
art,
David,
Florence,
Italy,
Michaelangelo,
Renaissance,
Rome,
Sistine Chapel,
the Uffizi,
Vatican
ITALY – FOOD
The food here is an art form, I’m sure of it. I didn’t
realise this but many people come here for culinary tourism like in the Eat,
Pray, Love book. Some people come to just eat and eat and eat. Others come to
learn how to cook. You can travel to Italy and take cooking classes learning a
specific cuisine or style. And people make homemade pasta here like it’s
nothing. I’ve never made pasta from scratch but it seems like it’s not an easy
thing to do.
I spent some time in the province of Liguria in the
Northwest coast of Italy. Liguria is known for being the birthplace of pesto.
For that reason, the moment you arrive in Liguria the restaurants start serving
pesto options like it is its own flavor. I am not used to that. I’m used to
pizza with pesto, not pesto pizza. I’m used to a tomato based pasta with pesto
not pesto pasta. But that is exactly what they had. You could have anything you
want in a pesto flavour or sauce. It was very interesting.
I think what was most interesting about the food is that
each city and town makes their food slightly differently. So I was on a mission
to try pizza in each town we were in and compare it. It took me awhile but I
finally became accustomed to the Italian-style pizza. I grew up liking pizza
with more calories, the thicker American-style or even the thickest
Chicago-style deep-dish pizza. So it took awhile to get used to it, but then it
felt good. You would eat pizza and still feel hungry (is that good?) or light.
But the main thing I saw everywhere was gelato.
Gelato seems like a national pastime in Italy. It’s what you
do when there’s nothing to do, especially when it’s hot. And it is quite
amazing. I’m not sure what it is exactly or how you make it, but it’s not like ice
cream. I didn’t even have milk-based gelato, I only had sorbetto (or sorbet).
Now, when you have sorbet outside of Italy, it takes like . . . like ice. In
Italy, the sorbetto is like ice cream. I’m not sure how to describe, but I had
to ask more than once “Are you sure there is no milk in this?” It was so
creamy. I’ve never had creamy-tasting sorbet before but that’s how Italian
sorbetto is. I loved it. Again, every town claims to have the best gelato. We
found the best gelato in a small suburban shop in Rome.
So now, I understand why people actually go and study
Italian cooking. I originally thought it was a bit narrow. How many ways can
you cook or make pasta? But it’s quite rich and diverse and has the potential
to be ridiculously tasty if done well. And, yes, we ate well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)